While staging their hoaxes the illuminati include jokes. This is a way to prove their point: their sheep = human cattle.

May 18, 2006

Illuminati jokes about The Pentagon, American Airlines Flight 77 and Terror Agenda

Illuminati Jokes from May 2006

Why did the perps, 5 years later, "release" a Pentagon video, which shows no plane, as proof that there was a plane?  (1)


- 1. Refreshing memories about who did 9/11, i.e. the "terrorize the sheep" agenda. As explained long ago, "The illuminati expected you to believe that there had been three flights and the Pentagon "crash" was staged to terrorize whoever started asking questions about 9/11, by letting them understand that it was an inside operation, as even the last idiot could see no plane at all." (2)

- 2. Diverting from the fact that one day after 9/11 they were already "releasing" the hoaxed videos with frontal crashes of the WTC planes;

- Mockery of the "human cattle", aka Illuminati jokes.

The mockery

How was this "release" packaged as mockery of the sheep? It was announced by CNN quoting Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, May 16, 2006."Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77". (1)

Joke #1 - the "I don't get it why they don't get it" type of jokes, i.e. repeating a previously released video and packaging it as new. This to have the "human cattle" react with : "The video doesn't show anything new. I don't get why they couldn't release this sooner, considering it looks almost exactly the same as the last video." (3)

Joke #2 - the "emperor's new clothes" type of jokes, i.e. despite inserting no plane in the video, releasing it as proof of a plane. This to have the "human cattle" react with : "I still don't see anything in the video, if this was trying to dispel conspiracy theories, it won't do anything to stop them." (4) Stating this implies that if the video released by the illuminati had a plane that would be proof that there was indeed one...

Joke #3 - the "honest illuminati" type of jokes, i.e. despite the fact that adding a plane to the video would be a five minutes job, they did not do it. What better proof they don't play foul?

(1) http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/16/pentagon.video/index.html

(2) message #2, from MattMarriott, May 17, 2006,  in "New 9/11 Pentagon Video Released" http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=2999835
Full story: Shanksville, Pentagon and the 9/11 "passengers": http://911-for-dummies.blogspot.com/2006/05/shanksville-pentagon-and-911_01.html

(3) message #1, from poster DhaliClone, May 17, 2006, id
(4) message #4, from poster SummerMadness, May 18, 2006, id

In Forums: http://christianforums.com/showthread.php?t=2999835